Fetter v. Bonner, et al.,
| George Fetter |
| Edward N. Bonner, County of Placer, California Forensics Medical Group and Placer County Sheriff Department |
| 2:2012cv02235 |
| August 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/20/17, ORDERING that Plaintiff's state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Plaintiff may refile his claim under California Civil Code §§ 5455.2 in the appropriate state forum. As no claims remain pending before this Court, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/3/2017; GRANTING 92 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims made under California Government Code §§ 1113539, the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim premised on California Civil Code §§ 5455.2. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/30/16: Mr. Hassan is sanctioned in the amount of $1,000. This sum shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court no later than 21 days from the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the State Bar of California. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/5/2016 GRANTING 87 Motion for 60-Day Extension. The last day to hear dispositive motions is AMENDED to 1/12/2017. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/1/16 ORDERING Mr. Hassan is order to show cause, in writing, within 14 days of this order, why further sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the court 's January 29, 2016 order. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 110 (providing that counsel's failure to comply with any order "may be grounds for imposition by the court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule within the inherent power of the Court."). (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
75
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/3/16 ORDERING that all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 5/9/2016. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/11/2016. The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be 11/9/2016. A Settlement Conference is SET for 6/20/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge Carolyn K. Delaney confidential settlement conference statements not later than 6/13/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/28/2016 ORDERING Attorney Allen Hassan, not his client, to pay the County defendants within 21 days, $671.50 for the reasonable expenses they incurred in bringing the 64 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses; ORDERING Mr. Hassan to inform the plaintiff in writing of this order, to provide a copy to the plainitff and to file a declaration within 21 days that his client has been so informed. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/7/16 ORDERING that hearing on defendants' 64 motion to compel is CONTINUED to 1/20/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 1/13/2016, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 1/13/2016. Defendants' may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 1/22/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/12/15 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 51 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is granted 10 days to amend any claim dismissed with leave to amend. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/13/14 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 41 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted 10 days to file an amended complaint. The motion for a more definite statement is DENIED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/18/2014 ORDERING that the 28 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is GRANTED ten (10) days from the date on which this order is filed to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies in any dismissed claim. Plaintiff is notified that a dismissal order with prejudice could be entered under Rule 41(b) if Plaintiff fails to amend a dismissed claim in the referenced second amended complaint. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/30/13: Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference RESET for 3/3/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/23/13: Plaintiff and his counsel are hereby ordered to show cause in a filed response to this OSC on or before August 12, 2013, in which they explain why sanctions should not be issued. HEARING as to 28 MOTION to DISMISS RESET for 8/26/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/29/2013 ORDERING that the 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff is GRANTED fourteen (14) days from the date on which this order is filed to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies in any dismissed claim against Defendants Placer County Sheriff Edward Bonner and the County of Placer. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/18/13 GRANTING plaintiff an extension to effectuate service on defendant California Forensics Medical Group until and including 4/25/13; CONTINUING Status Conference to 6/24/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. and DISMISSING remaining Doe defendants. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/4/2012 ORDERING Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, by 12/10/2012, as to why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a timely Status Report; CONTINUING that Status (Pretri al Scheduling) Conference to 2/25/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; ORDERING Plaintiff to file a Proof of Service or an explanation as to why service was not effected on Defendants Placer County Sheriff, Edward N. Bonner, County of Placer, California Forensics Medical Group, and Placer County Sheriff Department pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 4(m). (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/25/12: The motion, renoticed for hearing on October 2, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. before the undersigned judge 13 is VACATED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/17/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Ex Parte MOTION 5 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
