Williams v. Fackrell et al
| Curtis John Williams |
| M. Lindsey, W. Hanks, S. Barton, C. Fackrell, S. Kelly, R. Carter and J. Robbinette |
| 2:2012cv02291 |
| September 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/15/2013 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 15 motion to dismiss this action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2013. Defendants W. Hanks, R. Carter, M. Lindsey, S. Barton, and J. Robbinette without prejudice. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Curtis J. Williams signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/2013. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. The Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
