Kalani v. Castle Park, LLC et al
| Robert Kalani |
| Fujinaka Properties, L.P. and Castle Village LLC |
| 2:2012cv02330 |
| September 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/24/14 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice in its entirety. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/22/14 re 59 Notice of Settlement" The court now ORDERS that the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later than 30 days from the effective date of this order. All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby VACATED. Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/11/2014 ORDERING that counsel shall submit a declaration, under seal, making the required showing, no later than 7/21/2014 at 4:30 p.m. Counsel shall also file a declaration in the public record establ ishing that the firm has complied with Cal. R. Prof. Conduct § 3-700(D) (regarding client files and retainer agreement funds), or what steps it has taken to comply. The hearing date on the motion to withdraw as counsel is CONFIRMED for 7/28/2014 at 10:00 a.m. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/14/14 DENYING 41 Motion for Summary Judgment on his claim for an injuction requiring defendants to widen the entrace door to Office One and GRANTED on his Unruh Act claim; DENYING 35 Motion for Sum mary Judgment. Issues remaining for trial: 1)Whether defendants violated Title III of the ADA by virtue of the narrow entrance to Office One of the sales and leasing office; (2) Whether the sales and leasing office is now exempt from Title III of t he ADA by being entirely closed to the general public, and if so, whether an injunction is still needed to enforce this voluntary cessation of allegedly illegal discrimination; and(3) Whether an injunction or declaration should issue regarding the Clubhouse and its restroom, and the parking lot, to enforce defendants' voluntary cessation of allegedly illegal discrimination. (Meuleman, A) Modified on 4/15/2014 (Meuleman, A).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/21/2014 defendants' 45 Application for Reconsideration of 44 Order striking Motion for Summary Judgment. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/12/14 STRIKING 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; CONTINUING 35 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT to 4/7/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/28/14 ORDERING Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application to amend the court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order 17 , to continue by one day to April 7, 2014 the last date for hearing dispositive motions. Defendant has filed an opposition. Having reviewed the papers, the court finds good cause to make this minor amendment. Accordingly, plaintiff's application 36 is GRANTED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/12/2014 ORDERING re 33 Motion re: Discovery dispute filed by Fujinaka Properties, L.P., Castle Village LLC is DENIED as untimely. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/16/2014 ORDERING that the parties are in dispute regarding the propriety of certain areas of questioning posed by defense counsel to the deponent plaintiff. Questions pertaining to plaintiff& #039;s prior lawsuits are allowed. Any objections may be stated on the record. Deponent may be directed not to answer only if necessary to preserve a privilege. Defendants are allowed to depose plaintiff for seven hours. In the event the seven ho urs of deposition are not completed in one day, defendants may renotice the deposition so as to complete the seven hours without further order of court, provided that said deposition complies with the court's scheduling order of 11/15/2012. Defendants' request for a discovery referee is DENIED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying without prejudice 22 , 24 EX PARTE APPLICATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/19/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/11/2013 ORDERING 22 Ex Parte Application for certain discovery, and to modify the Court's Status Pretrial Scheduling Conference 17 ; the applicaton does not show good cause for the court to alter the Scheduling Order; the portion of the application seeking a modification to the Scheduling Order is DENIED; the remainder of the application is REFERRED back to Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/3/13: Plaintiff shall file the Proposed Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18-3), within 10 days of the date of this order. The Scheduling Conference Order, together with all dates set therein, is otherwise CONFIRMED. The hearing on this motion, currently scheduled for April 8, 2013, is hereby VACATED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
17
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/14/12: Discovery deadline set for 2/14/2014, Law & Motion deadline set for 4/4/2014, Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/4/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK ) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton, 5 day Court Trial set for 11/4/2014 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. A Settlement Conference will be set before a judge other than the trial judge at the time of the Pretrial Conference. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
