Conservation Congress v. U.S. Forest Service et al
| Conservation Congress |
| U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
| 2:2012cv02416 |
| September 24, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| William B. Shubb |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 Endangered Species Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/23/15 ORDERING that defendants' 74 motion to lift the injunction is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and to close this case. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/8/2016 GRANTING 77 Joint Motion to Appear by Telephone at the hearing on Federal Defendants' Motion to Lift the Injunction set for 3/21/2016 at 1:30 pm. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ON STIPULATED AGREEMENT RESOLVING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/16/14. The Parties' 72 Stipulated Agreement is APPROVED. The 6/30/14 71 motion hearing is VACATED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
64
STIPULATION and ORDER for extension of time to file attorney fee motion 63 by the EAJA deadline (October 24, 2013, if no appeal is filed; and if an appeal is filed, then thirty days after the deadline to petition for certiorari), signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/16/2013. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/27/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs' remaining claims for violation of the ESA be, and the same hereby are, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
59
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/21/2013 ORDERING that the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulated request to extend the deadline for the joint status report indicated in the Court's recent 55 order until 6/24/2013. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/5/13 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion to defer consideration of its ESA claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; with respect to the Log Sprin gs and M9 Projects, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is DENIED and USFS's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and with respect to the Tatham Project, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and USFS's moti on for summary judgment is DENIED. USFS shall not begin its proposed actions on the Tatham Project without the preparation and consideration of legally adequate documentation under NEPA. Within fourteen days of this Order, the parties shall submit a joint Status Report conforming to the April 26, 2013 Stipulation Scheduling Order, or explaining why the court should modify that Scheduling Order. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
54
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/31/2013 ORDERING 53 Stipulation and Proposed Order is granted. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/26/2013 ORDERING that apart from written discovery responses due from the Parties in mid-April 2013, all discovery, pretrial, and trial deadlines shall be STAYED until 3 days after the Court issues an order resolving by granting, denying, or granting/denying in part the currently pending motions for summary judgment ("Order"). All pretrial deadlines (including the pretrial conference and pretrial statements) shall be VACATED, to be reset after the Order. The Parties will file a separate stipulated request for vacatur of the trial date per the Court's 19 scheduling order. Within 30 days after the Order (if not dispositive of case) or no earlier than 7/1 /2013, Federal Defendants will serve the notice of deposition of Plaintiff's expert and serve a subpoena for her deposition on Plaintiff's counsel, which Plaintiff's counsel agrees to accept. Defendants' expert disclosures will be due 14 days after the completion of Ms. Bond's deposition. The Parties' rebuttal expert disclosures will be due 14 days after Defendants' expert disclosures. All discovery will be closed 21 days after rebuttal disclosures. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER 37 signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/2/2013 GRANTING parties' Request regarding Discovery. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting Unopposed Motion to Adjust Summary Judgment Schedule 32 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/8/2013. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Re Defendants' Motion to Limit Review to the Administrative Record 17 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/26/2013: Defendants motion is DENIED without prejudice to the right to object subsequently to the consideration of material outside of the record. Plaintiff may pursue discovery regarding its ESA claims against USFS while plaintiff litigates its summary judgment motion on its claims under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/12/13 RESETTING Summary Judgment Schedule. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/5/2013 granting 22 Federal Defendants' Request to appear by telephone at 2/25/2013 motion hearing. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
