Patterson v. People of the State of California

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Patterson v. People of the State of California

Patterson v. People of the State of California

Petitioner:	Bryan Damon Patterson
Respondent:	People of the State of California
Case Number:	2:2012cv02475
Filed:	October 1, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 10, 2014	Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/9/14 ORDERING that the court takes no action on petitioners filing as this case is now closed. Petitioner is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.(Dillon, M)
March 4, 2014	Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/4/2014 recommending that Pattersons application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied; Pattersons 22 motion for jury trial or evidentiary hearing be denied; Pattersons [ 27] motion for judgment be denied as moot; Pattersons 30 motion of inquiry be denied as moot; and Pattersons 31 motion for judgment be denied as moot. Objections to the findings and recommendations may be filed within 14 days after being served; failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.(Waggoner, D)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 10, 2014

Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/9/14 ORDERING that the court takes no action on petitioners filing as this case is now closed. Petitioner is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.(Dillon, M)

March 4, 2014

Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/4/2014 recommending that Pattersons application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied; Pattersons 22 motion for jury trial or evidentiary hearing be denied; Pattersons [ 27] motion for judgment be denied as moot; Pattersons 30 motion of inquiry be denied as moot; and Pattersons 31 motion for judgment be denied as moot. Objections to the findings and recommendations may be filed within 14 days after being served; failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.(Waggoner, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. People of the State of California
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California
Represented By:	Pamela K Critchfield
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Bryan Damon Patterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?