Ardell v. Sacramento Sheriff's Department et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Smith Ardell
Defendant: State of California, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Sacramento County Jail
Case Number: 2:2012cv02488
Filed: October 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/13/13 RECOMMENDING that this action is dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/8/13 ORDERING that the February 5, 2013 findings and recommendations 7 are VACATED; and the complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days.(Dillon, M)
February 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/05/13 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
December 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/05/12 vacating 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. In due course, the court will screen the amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/19/12 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/2012 ORDERING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend; and Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint; Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Waggoner, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ardell v. Sacramento Sheriff's Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Smith Ardell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?