Mosley v. Broyles
Plaintiff: Derrick Mosley
Defendant: Broyles
Case Number: 2:2012cv02681
Filed: October 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/07/13 ordering that the court finds that plaintiff's appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should not continue on appeal. (cc: USCA,9th circuit) (Plummer, M)
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/23/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration 16 is DENIED; and Plaintiffs motion to amend 17 is DENIED. (Dillon, M)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/23/13 ORDERING that the First Amended Complaint 12 be dismissed with prejudice, and this action is closed. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/13/13 granting 7 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be collected in accordance with the court's CDC order filed concurrently herewith. The complaint is dismissed for the reasons discussed above with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
December 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/14/12 vacating 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff need take no further action until the complaint is screened. (Plummer, M)
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/10/12: ORDERING that the Clerk of Court assign a district judge to this action. RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. F&R referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due by within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/1/12 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court; the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mosley v. Broyles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broyles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?