Johnson v. Felker et al
| Maurice Johnson |
| Tom Felker, Matthew Cate, Mike McDonald, M. Wright, P. Cochrane, D. Griffith, B. Ingwerson, J. Lewis, J. Miller, M. Beutter, D. Phang, B. Ramsey, M. Dangler and D. Jackson |
| 2:2012cv02719 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| John F. Moulds |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/13/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/23/15 ordering that within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/15/15 ordering defendant's motion to compel (54 at 5-9; 54-1) is granted. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall provide without objection responses to defendant Statti's discovery requests propounded on 04/01/15 and shall file a notice with the court attesting to his compliance with this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/17/15 ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART 46 Findings and Recommendations, as set forth: a. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Alexander, Anderson, Aston, Fannon, Guzman , Ingwerson, Lewis, Lindsey, Look, McBride, Ramsey, Spangle, and Wheeler are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on his failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies; b. Plaintiff's due process claims against defendant Griffith based on Appeal Log No. HDSP-D-08-0675 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on his failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies; c. Plaintiff's overcrowding claim against defendant Cate is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on plaintiff's fa ilure to properly exhaust administrative remedies; and d. Defendant Statti's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's due process claims based on Appeal Log No. 08-D-08-01669 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal. The parties are GRANT ED an opportunity to conduct discovery, limited to plaintiff's efforts to exhaust his administrative remedies while housed in Ad Seg on 8/7/08, on or before 60 days from the date of this order. Defendant Statti's renewed motion for summa ry judgment based on plaintiffs alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies shall be filed 30 days thereafter. Plaintiff's opposition and evidence shall be filed 21 days thereafter, and defendants' reply shall be filed 7 days after plaintiff's opposition. Local Rule 230(l). (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
46
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/03/14 recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment 37 be granted in part and denied in part. (See findings and recommendations for further details). MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 37 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/25/14. The Plaintiff's 38 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice. The Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. The 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/18/2014 GRANTING defendants' 35 motion to modify; defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust within 30 days; discovery is STAYED until defendants' motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust is resolved; and 30 days after the district court rules on defendants' motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust, the parties may serve discovery requests, if appropriate. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms within 30 days on 1/17/14. Service is appropriate for L Alexander, R. Anderson, C. Aston, Matthew Cate, J. Fannon, D. Griffith, N. Guzman, B. Ingwerson, J. Lewis, M. Lindsey, S. Look, D. McBride, B. Ramsey, D. Spangle, P Statti, B. Wheeler. Clerk to send plaintiff: instruction sheet, 1 Summons, 16 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copy of the Amended Complaint filed on 1/3/14. The findings and recommendations filed on January 10, 2014 (ECF No. 20 ), are vacated.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/10/2014 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/3/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs first amended complaint is dismissed; Plaintiffs request to attach exhibits to his amended complaint (ECF No. 17 ) is DENIED; Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a second amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Maurice Johnson signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/06/13. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
