McFarland v. Almond Board of California et al
| Susi McFarland |
| Almond Board of California and Tim Birmingham |
| 2:2012cv02778 |
| November 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/11/2015 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1); each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/30/2014 ORDERING 65 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Almond Board of California is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART; and MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 64 filed by Tim Birmingham is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
96
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/9/14: The parties may disclose expert witnesses at a date after the Court makes a ruling on the pending summary judgment motions. In the event the Court sets a new trial date, the parties shall make expert witness disclosures no later than sixty (60) days before trial, and supplemental disclosures within thirty (30) days after the initial expert disclosures are made. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
63
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/16/14: Plaintiff's Third, Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action asserted against Defendant TIM BIRMINGHAM only are dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
60
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/29/2014 ORDERING that dispositive motions be heard by 12/17/2014 at 09:30 AM. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
57
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/20/14 ORDERING that the deadline for the parties to complete Discovery is CONTINUED to 10/13/14, and Expert Discovery to 1/15/15 as agreed upon and requested by the parties.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/16/13 ORDERING that within seven days from the date of this order, defendant Almond Board shall produce documents bate-stamped nos. 787, 832, 855-878, 880, 881, 883-895, 897-917. Documents produced pursuant to this order shall be used solely for purposes of this litigation. The remaining documents submitted for in camera review need not be produced. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/3/13 ORDERING the Defendant's motion for protective order 40 is granted in part. The privacy interests of non-party Jenny Konschak will be appropriately accommodated by an in camera review of her personnel file to ensure that only matters relevant to the claims are disclosed. No later than 10/9/13, defendant Almond Board shall submit to the chambers of the undersigned a bate-stamped copy of the personnel file of Jenny Konschak; In light of the allegations of the complaint and after review of the evidentiary materials submitted in support and opposition to the pending motion, the court concludes that defendant's proposed protective order is not warranted and would unduly circumscribe plaintiff's legitimate scope of discovery. The motion for protective order is accordingly denied as to the requested limitations on areas of inquiry. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/24/2013 MODIFYING the time limitations provided by L.R. 230(c) and (d); ALLOWING Plaintiff 28 days to file an Opposition Brief to any Motion for Summary Judgment; ALLOWING Defendants 14 days to file a Reply Brief to any Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDERING that any Motion for Summary Judgment be filed and served 60 days prior to the scheduled hearing. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/15/13. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/25/13 DENYING 9 Motion to Compel. Defendants must file their responsive pleading within 20 days of this Order. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER 15 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/29/13 ORDERING that the filing of the Joint Status Report is postponed until the Court makes a ruling on Defendants' Petition to Compel Arbitration and Joinder in Petition to Compe l Arbitration. In the event the Court denies either the Petition to Compel Arbitration or the Joinder in Petition to Compel Arbitration or both, the parties will meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report within 21 days of the Court's final order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
