Conservation Congress v. U.S. Forest Service et al
Plaintiff: |
Conservation Congress |
Defendant: |
U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
Case Number: |
2:2012cv02800 |
Filed: |
November 15, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Sacramento |
Presiding Judge: |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Presiding Judge: |
Garland E. Burrell |
Nature of Suit: |
Environmental Matters |
Cause of Action: |
16:1538 Endangered Species Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 20, 2014 |
Filing
108
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/18/2014 OVERRULING Plaintiff's 95 Objections to 92 Bill of Costs; AWARDING costs to the defendants in the amount of $9,502.12. (Michel, G)
|
November 6, 2014 |
Filing
107
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/14 DENYING 97 Motion for Injunction. (Manzer, C)
|
May 19, 2014 |
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/16/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 52 Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims 1 through 6 of the First Supplemental Complaint 33 is DENIED. Defendants' 68 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Intervenors' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 81 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is MOOT and the Court does not reach this issue. (Kastilahn, A)
|
December 17, 2013 |
Filing
61
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/16/2013 ORDERING the court hereby imposes a monetary SANCTION of $250 to be paid to the Clerk of the Court by Plaintiff counsel Marianne Dugan within 14 days of the issuance of this order. The sanction is personal to counsel, and is not to be borne by her client. (cc: financial unit) (Waggoner, D)
|
December 3, 2013 |
Filing
58
ORDER granting 56 Motion re page limit signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/13: Federal Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenors' cross-motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support, and response to Plaintiff's mo tion for summary judgment shall be filed on January 13, 2013. Plaintiff may file a response/opposition on or before January 17, 2013 at 5:00 pm. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing within 7 days of the entry of this order, as to why it should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500.00 for failure to comply with this Court's orders. (Kaminski, H)
|
November 21, 2013 |
Filing
49
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/20/2013 GRANTING 47 Motion for Extension of Time; ORDERING that the plaintiff file its Motion for Summary Judgment by 11/20/2013; ORDERING that the defendants a file their Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and their opposition to the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment by 12/23/2013; ORDERING that the plaintiff file its reply to the defendants' opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment and its opposition to the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by 1/3/2014; ORDERING the defendants to file their reply to the plaintiff's opposition to the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by 1/13/2014. (Michel, G)
|
February 14, 2013 |
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/14/13 GRANTING 14 Motion to Intervene and APPROVING Stipulation to Stay Litigation. (Meuleman, A)
|
January 10, 2013 |
Filing
22
NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/2013 ORDERING 7 that this Court DECLINES to relate case(s) 2:11-CV-2605 LKK EFB and 2:12-CV-2800 GEB CKD. (Reader, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?