Gilkerson v. Harter et al
| Tracy Gilkerson |
| Berkshire Hathaway Homestead Companies, Anne Weilepp, American Commercial Claims Administrators, Robert Theissen, Laughlin Falbo Levy & Moresi, LLP, Douglas E. Jaffe, Joseph Ahn, Shaw, Jacobsmeyer, Crain, Claffey & Nix, LLP, Haines, Pollack and Joel Harter |
| 2:2012cv02826 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/29/2013 RECOMMENDING that Defendants Berkshire Hathaway Homestead Companies; American Commercial Claims Administrators; Shaw, Jacobsmeyer, Crain, Claffey & Nix, LLP; La ughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi, LLP; Jaffe; Ahn, Weilepp; and, Ely be dismissed from this action for plaintiff's failure to serve them. Remaining defendants' WCAB, Harter, Thiessen, and Rebeck's 8 motion to dismiss be granted. Plain tiff's 5 first amended complaint be dismissed. The allegations against the WCAB and the administrative law judges appear both legally and factually frivolous. No purpose would be served by granting plaintiff leave to amend against these defendants. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that they be finally dismissed from this action. Motion referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/27/13: Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within fourteen days from the date of this order, why defendants Berkshire Hathaway Homestead Companies; American Commercial Claims Administrators; Shaw, Jacobsmeyer, Crain, Claffey & Nix, LLP; Laughlin, Falbo, Levy & Moresi, LLP; Jaffe; Ahn; Weilepp; and Ely should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Failure to timely file the required writing will result in a recommendation that these defendants be dismissed. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
