Chacko v. City of Sacramento
| Jesudas K. Chacko |
| City of Sacramento |
| 2:2012cv02881 |
| November 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| John F. Moulds |
| Morrison C. England |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/15/14 ordering the above-captioned case has settled. The court now orders that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than 60 days from the date of this order. All hearing date set in this matter are vacated and all pending motions are denied as moot. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/2014 ORDERING that within 10 days plaintiff shall inform the court whether he waives disqualification of the undersigned conducting a settlement conference, or whether the settlement confere nce should be randomly assigned to another magistrate judge. Plaintiff's 31 motion to seal is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the documents attached to plaintiff's 3/17/2014 request to plaintiff. (Zignago, K.) Modified on 3/19/2014 (Zignago, K.).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/24/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2/27/13 MOTION to Amend the Complaint 26 is DENIED without prejudice; and Within fourteen days of the date of this order, the parties shall inform the court whether they waive disqualification of the undersigned to conduct a settlement conference or whether the court should randomly assign another magistrate judge.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/13 ORDERING that within fourteen days of the date of this order, defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's request to settle this action and address whether it would be appropriate for the court to schedule an early settlement conference. Within seven days of Defendant's response, Plaintiff shall submit a reply thereto; and Plaintiff's Request for the appointment of Counsel 19 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/10/13 ORDERING that Defendant shall respond to plaintiff's 15 request within14 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's deadline for filing an amended complaint is stayed pending resolution of plaintiff's 15 request. Defendant's 16 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to re-noticing the motion. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 08/05/13 adopting 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' 1/24/13 motion to dismiss 5 is granted; and not later than 30 days following the date this order is electronically filed, plaintiff may file an amended complaint to include new allegations as to the defendant. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/10/13 Recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 5 be granted. Plaintiff be given 30 days to file an amended complaint. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/20/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel 2 is DENIED; Plaintiff shall serve and file within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order his opposition or his statement of non-opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss; Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and The February 28, 2013 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is VACATED in light of this order. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chacko v. City of Sacramento | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Sacramento | |
| Represented By: | Sari Myers Dierking |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jesudas K. Chacko | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
