Ramirez v. Mayes et al
| Andrew Ramirez |
| Bonnie Lee, L.D. Zamora, D. Swingle and R. Mayes |
| 2:2012cv02891 |
| November 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/19/13 ORDERING that the amended complaint filed March 6, 2013 16 is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Andrew Ramirez signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/13/2013. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. The Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/03/12 ordering plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
