Ivory v. Unknown
Norman Ivory |
Unknown |
2:2012cv02902 |
November 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lassen |
Allison Claire |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/23/15 recommending that defendant's motion for summary judgment 55 be granted and the first amended complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 47 be denied as moot. Judgment be entered for defendant. Motions 47 and 55 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/01/14 granting 37 Motion to Strike plaintiff's reply to the answer. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 33 ORDER adopting 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/5/14: 20 Motion to Dismiss is denied in part and granted in part. Defendant Miranda is directed to file an answer to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim within thirty days of the date of this order. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 29 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/15/14 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 22 is vacated as premature, without prejudice to renewal pursuant to the scheduling order that will i ssue following defendant's filing of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to make a random assignment of a district judge to this case. U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that def endant's motion to dismiss 20 be denied in part and granted in part as follows: Denied as to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim. Granted as to plaintiff's claim under the ADA. Defendant Miranda be directed to file an answer to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim within 30 days of the order adopting these findings and recommendations. MOTION to DISMISS 20 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/17/13 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Norman Ivory to the clerk until the balance of $350 is pa id in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders)(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ivory v. Unknown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Norman Ivory | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Unknown | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.