E.M.M. v. Commissioner of Social Security
E. M. M. and Consuelo Mercadal |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2012cv02907 |
November 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/14/2014 DENYING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 22 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/1/13 GRANTING 18 Motion to Stay. Case Management Deadline: 4/3/2014. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/3/2013 ORDERING 15 that plaintiff shall have a 8-Day EXTENSION of time, to and including 9/6/2013, in which to fila a motion for summary judgment. (Reader, L) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/18/2012. The 3 Motion to Appoint Consuelo Mercadal as Ad Litem for plaintiff is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Clerk directed to serve Magistrate J udge Claire's Scheduling Order and serve copy of Order on U.S. Marshal. Within 15 days from date of Order, plaintiff shall submit to U.S. Marshal a completed Summons, copies of Complaint, and file a Statement with Court that said documents have been submitted. [cc: U.S. Marshal Services] (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.