Vistica v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company et al
Plaintiff: Andrew J. Vistica
Defendant: U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2012cv02935
Filed: December 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/8/2014 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1); each side bearing its own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STATUS (Pre-trial Scheduling) ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/13: All Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 9/17/2014, and hearing on such motions shall be on 10/15/2014 at 9:30 a.m.; All discovery shall be completed by 8/8/2014; Desi gnation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/20/2014, and supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal experts due by 6/27/2014; Pretrial Conference is SET for 11/21/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; Jury Trial is SET for 1/12/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. The parties estimate a trial length of approximately 4 to 6 days. (Kastilahn, A)
February 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/11/2013 ORDERING that the responsive pleading deadline for U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation to answer the complaint is 2/22/2013. (Zignago, K.)
January 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/15/13. The Responsive pleading deadline for the defendants is 2/8/13. (Manzer, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vistica v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Represented By: Christian Penn Foote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Christian Penn Foote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Christian Penn Foote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew J. Vistica
Represented By: Thomas D. Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?