Andrea Jarreau-Griffin, et al v. City of Vallejo, et al
Plaintiff: |
Andrea Jarreau-Griffin and the Estate of Guy J. Jarreau Jr. |
Defendant: |
City of Vallejo and Kent Tribble |
Case Number: |
2:2012cv02979 |
Filed: |
December 10, 2012 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Solano |
Presiding Judge: |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Presiding Judge: |
Kendall J. Newman |
Nature of Suit: |
P.I.: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 12, 2016 |
Filing
89
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/12/2016 ORDERING that the court amends the pretrial scheduling order and sets forth the following dates: Settlement Conference set for 3/17/2017; Discovery due by 4/30/2017; Expert Discovery completion 5/31/2017; Dispositive Motions heard by 7/28/2017; Joint pretrial conf. statements due 9/15/2017; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/6/2017; Trial Briefs due 10/23/2017; Jury Trial set for 11/6/2017. (Zignago, K.)
|
May 18, 2015 |
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/15/15 DENYING 56 Motion for Judgment. (Meuleman, A)
|
January 9, 2015 |
Filing
61
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/8/15. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
June 23, 2014 |
Filing
53
STATUS PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/23/2014 ORDERING Initial disclosures as required by FRCP 26(a) shall be completed within 14 days of the Status Conference; all discovery by 2/6/2015; Disclosure of Expert Witn esses due by 2/20/2015, Supplemental list of expert witnesses 3/13/2015; All expert discovery by 4/10/2015; Dispositive Motions filed by 6/19/2015; Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/3/2015 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. M ueller, Joint Pretrial Conference Statement by 8/13/2015; Jury Trial set for 10/19/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, Trial Briefs by 10/5/2015; Settlement Conference set for 10/24/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.(Reader, L)
|
April 15, 2014 |
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/14/2014 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 38 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Michel, G)
|
December 9, 2013 |
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/6/13 re: 16 Motion to Dismiss: the Defendants' motion to dismiss the third cause of action to the extent it is premised on the Fourteenth Amendment is GRANTED, and that cause of action is DISMIS SED without leave to amend to the extent it is premised on the Fourteenth Amendment; the defendants' motion to dismiss the fourth cause of action to the extent it is premised on the Fourth Amendment is GRANTED, and that cause of action is DISM ISSED without leave to amend to the extent it is based on the Fourth Amendment; the defendants' motion to dismiss the fifth cause of action is GRANTED, and the cause of action is DISMISSED with leave to amend; the defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims for punitive damage against the city is GRANTED, and the claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Meuleman, A)
|
November 6, 2013 |
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/5/13 ORDERING that defendants' 23 motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied without prejudice; and plaintiffs' 28 ex parte application for an extension of time is denied as moot. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?