Paige v. CAL PIA et al
| David A. Paige |
| Kamala Harris, Timothy Hart, CAL PIA and Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation |
| 2:2012cv03023 |
| December 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of David A. Paige signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/23/13. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/4/13 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of service of this order, either the $350.00 filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma paupe ris on the form provided with this order; Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file an amended complaint. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner and a § 1983 civil rights complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
