Dev v. Donahoe
Lal Dev |
Patrick R. Donahoe |
2:2012cv03026 |
December 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/25/2014 DENYING plaintiff's motion to strike the declaration of Sandra Schmidt. The Clerk is ORDERED to file the 9/6/2013 deposition of plaintiff in this ca se. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the 27 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, judgment be entered in defendant's favor and the clerk be directed to close the case. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. (Donati, J) |
Filing 53 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/27/2014 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 50 are ADOPTED; and Plaintiff's 45 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/8/14 DENYING 51 Motion to File Documents Electronically. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 50 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/22/2014 ORDERING hearing re: 45 MOTION to AMEND by Lal Dev is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that Motion to Amend be denied. Matter referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/7/14 DENYING 32 Motion for Reconsideration. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 31 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/6/2014 ORDERING hearing on defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 2/5/2014; plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 1/22/2014, why sanction s should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion; plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 1/22/2014; failure of p laintiff to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-opposition thereto, and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and/or failure to comply with court orders and this court's Local Rules; defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 1/29/2014. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/2/2014 DENYING 29 Motion to Stay. (Michel, G) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/21/2013 ORDERING 21 Motion to Compel is GRANTED; within 7 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall provide full and complete responses to defendant's Interrogatories Nos. 10 and 11; and the 10/23/2013 hearing on defendant's motion to compel is VACATED. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/16/2013 DENYING 23 Motion to Disqualify. (Donati, J) |
Filing 20 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/18/2013 ORDERING that cases 2:12-CV-03026 TLN-EFB-PS and 2:11-CV-02950 JAM-EFB-PS are RELATED. The action denominated 2:12-CV-03026 TLN-EFB-PS is REASSIGNED to Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:12-CV-03026 JAM-EFB-PS.(Zignago, K.) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/4/2013 ORDERING 11 Motion to Compel Attendance is GRANTED; Plaintiff is to appear on 9/6/2013 at 10:00 a.m. at the United States Attorney's Office, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. (Waggoner, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dev v. Donahoe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe | |
Represented By: | Edward A Olsen, GOVT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lal Dev | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.