Steshenko v. McKay et al
| Gregory Steshenko |
| Kristine Scopazzi, Berthalupe Carrillo, Sally Newell, Watsonville Community Hospital, Thomas McKay, Dorothy Nunn, Anne Lucero and Cabrillo Community College District |
| 2:2012mc00062 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Alameda |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/09/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's MOTION for leave to electronically file all further papers in this case is DENIED as unnecessary. Plaintiff's MOTION to Quash, filed 8/10/12 1 is DENIED as moot. The 10/18/12 hearing is VACATED from the calendar. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/22/2012. Plaintiffstates that due to his indigence he cannot appear in Sacramento for a hearing on Motion. However, he must notice the Motion for hearing in accordance with Eastern District Loc al Rule 230(b). He will be permitted to appear by phone. Plaintiff shall notice 1 Motion to Quash for hearing, serve it on all defendants in action who have not yet been served, and on non-party Employment Development Department, and file a Statement of Service within 14 days of this Order. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
