Ennes et al v. US Bank National Association et al
| Roger Ennes and Karen Ennes |
| US Bank National Association, America's Servicing Company, Mortgage Electronic Information Systems, Inc. and Quality Loan Service Corporation |
| 2:2013cv00082 |
| January 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| John F. Moulds |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/6/2013. The action 2:13-CV-0086 WBS DAD is REASSIGNED to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds for all further proceedings and Clerk shall make appropriate adjustment. Upon further review, 2:13-CV-0086 GEB JFM is REMANDED to Superior Court for State of California, County of San Joaquin from which it was removed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/20/13 ORDERED that this matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action; and All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/15/2013 transferring case to the Sacramento Division. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
