Joseph v. California Prison Industry Authority et al
Alonzo Joseph |
California Prison Industry Authority, William Knipp, Lizarraga, J. D. Lozano, D. Artis and J. Leese |
2:2013cv00122 |
January 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/19/2023 DENYING 21 Motion to Remove all Court Filing Fees. (Donati, J) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/20/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to amend, construed herein as a motion for relief from judgment 13 is DENIED. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/4/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 8 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel 5 is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. CASE CLOSED.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/8/2013 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a completed affidavit to proceed ifp; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a certified trust account statment. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.