Lally v. Rabobank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Jasbir Lally
Defendant: Rabobank, N.A.
Counter_claimant: Rabobank, N.A.
Counter_defendant: Jasbir Lally
Case Number: 2:2013cv00130
Filed: January 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER TO RELEASE SECURITY DEPOSIT signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/15/2021 ORDERING that Defendant Rabobank, N.A.'S security deposit in the amount of $5,000.00, posted on 2/21/2013 be released in its entirety and delivered to Mechanics Bank (as successor in interest to Rabobank, N.A), in care of its attorneys at 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor, Sacramento, California 95814. (cc: Financial Department)(Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/5/2021 ORDERING that Defendant Rabobank, N.A.'s security deposit in the amount of $5,000.00, posted on 2/21/2013 be released in its entirety and delivered to Defendant Rabobank, N.A, in care of its attorneys at 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor, Sacramento, California 95814. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/16/2015 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/12/2014 GRANTING 31 Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's third and fourth causes of action and REAFFIRMS its prior decision granting summary judgment for Defendant on all of the other causes of action in Plaintiff's Complaint; DENYING Plaintiff's 38 Motion to Strike. (Reader, L)
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/14 ORDERING: The court finds that in the circumstances of this case, an independent medical examination pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 is warranted. Accordingly, plaintiff shall appear for an independent medical examination, comprised of an eight-hour period of testing that will include both verbal interviewing and written examinations, to be conducted by Dr. Herbert Weissman, Ph.D., in Sacramento, on one of the following dates: Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Thursday, July 10, 2014, Tuesday, July 22, 2014, or Wednesday, July 23, 2014. (Becknal, R)
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/11/13, ORDERING that Counterdefendant Jasbir Lally and her agents, representatives and all persons acting in concert or participating with her are restraining and enjoined fr om engaging in or performing directly or indirectly any and all of the acts outlined in this order. It is further ordered that in order to maintain this preliminary injunction order in effect, Rabobank continue to maintain the corporate security bond or cashiers check in the amount of $5,000.00, which was lodged with the Court on 2/21/2013 as security which the court deems proper for the payment of such cost and damages as may be suffered by any party which is found to be wrongfully restrained. (Kastilahn, A)
February 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/19/13: Show Cause Hearing set for 3/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. In order to maintain this tempo rary restraining order in effect, Rabobank shall post a corporate security bond or cashier's check in the amount of Five Thousand dollars ($5,000.00) as security which the court deems proper for the payment of such cost and damages as may be suffered by any party which is found to be wrongfully restrained. Such bond shall be posted by 4:00 p.m. on February 22, 2013. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lally v. Rabobank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasbir Lally
Represented By: Aldon Louis Bolanos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rabobank, N.A.
Represented By: Charles L. Post
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Rabobank, N.A.
Represented By: Charles L. Post
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Jasbir Lally
Represented By: Aldon Louis Bolanos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?