Carroll v. Knipp et al
| D. Carroll |
| Tim Virga, Hientschell, Camp, Leistmeister, Haring, William Knipp, CCPDA, State of California, CDCR, Wilkerson and CDCR Mental Health Department |
| 2:2013cv00215 |
| February 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/12/14 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to file in this action the Referral Notice filed March 7, 2014 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the parties to this action. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/4/2014 ORDERING that plaintiff's 32 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
28
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/26/13 recommending that defendant Hientschell's motion to dismiss 22 be granted; and this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to brining suit. MOTION to DISMISS 22 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/05/13 vacating 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant Hientschell is granted until 11/15/13 to file a reply to plaintiff's opposition to defendant Hientschell's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel 25 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/01/13 recommending that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/24/13 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of D. Carroll signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/03/13. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/01/13 ordering that plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/11/13 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
