Hill v. Comcast Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Hill
Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and Comcast Corporation
Case Number: 2:2013cv00281
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/1/2013 GRANTING 18 Motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint; ORDERING the plaintiff to file the First Amended Complaint attached to the motion within 5 days. (Michel, G)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 5/31/13 ORDERING that the status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for hearing on 6/10/2013 is VACATED; plaintiff has until 7/1/2013, to file a motion for leave to amend; all discovery shall be completed by 6/25/2014; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 1/24/2014, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure due by 2/24/2014; the last hearing date for a motion is 8/25/2014, commencing at 9 :00 a.m.; the Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 10/27/2014 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Trial is SET for 1/21/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/24/2013 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 5 Motion is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/18/2013. Plaintiff is ordered to SHOW CAUSE in writing, to be filed no later 4/29/2013, why sanctions should not be imposed against him and/or counsel for failure to file a timely Statu s Report. If OSC hearing is requested, it will be held just prior to Status Conference which is RE-SCHEDULED to 6/10/2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Status Hearing. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Comcast Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC
Represented By: Mark S. Spring
Represented By: Robin E. Largent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comcast Corporation
Represented By: Mark S. Spring
Represented By: Robin E. Largent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Hill
Represented By: Dow Wakefield Patten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?