Kozlowski et al v. Stroomberg et al
| Marco Kozlowski, Luxury Homes Solutions, Inc., Brad Wakeman, Kadri A Egbeyemi and Kozlowski, Wakeman, Egbeyemi Partnership |
| Riemke Koolen, Angelic Stroomberg, Dick Stroomberg, Mihai Algiu, Huib Stroomberg, Traci Southwell, Stroomwell Investment Group, Inc. and George Stroomberg |
| 2:2013cv00291 |
| February 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/27/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 60 Motion to Reconsider is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/28/2013 GRANTING defendant Traci Southwell's 53 Motion to Dismiss. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/21/13 ORDERING the Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. All claims against her are dismissed. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their complaint within 20 days. Defendant is ordered to file a responsive pleading within 20 days of any amended complaint that contains claims against her, but if no such complaint is filed then she is dismissed from this lawsuit. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
