Wardlaw et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff: William Wardlaw, Feinstein for Senate Committee and Fund for the Majority Committee
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice
Case Number: 2:2013cv00379
Filed: February 26, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/19/13. Each party bearing its own costs and attorney's fees. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION and ORDER 8 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/19/13 ORDERING that Defendant may disclose to plaintiffs any and all contents of computers/servers of Durkee and Associates LLC in the custody of the FBI; Plaintiffs are to su pply their own appropriate digital media to store that information; Defendant DOJ shall not have the rights or the burdens of a Producing Party under Protective Order 1.b., found in CR 1 at 68; Plaintiffs must treat Durkee or other appropriate part ies to the Wardlaw Proceeding or the Interpleader Action, and must not treat DOJ, as the "Producing Party" within the meaning of the Protective Order; Plaintiffs must seek any needed agreements of parties or rulings of the Superior Court t o treat Durkee or other appropriate parties to the Wardlaw Proceeding or the Interpleader Action, and not to treat DOJ, as the "Producing Party"; This action is to be dismissed with prejudice upon notice filed by either side that contents of computers/servers of Durkee and Associates LLC in the custody of the FBI have been disclosed to plaintiffs; Each party must bear its own costs and attorneys fees in this action. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wardlaw et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Wardlaw
Represented By: Justin T. Berger
Represented By: Niall P. McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Feinstein for Senate Committee
Represented By: Justin T. Berger
Represented By: Niall P. McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fund for the Majority Committee
Represented By: Justin T. Berger
Represented By: Niall P. McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?