Susanville Indian Rancheria v. Sebelius et al
| Susanville Indian Rancheria |
| Kathleen Sebelius, Yvette Roubideaux and United States of America |
| 2:2013cv00408 |
| March 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/6/2014 ORDERING that the deadline for the filing of dispositional documents is EXTENDED from 8/8/2014 to 9/5/2014. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/10/14. Dispositional documents are to be filed no later that 8/8/14. All hearing dates are VACATED and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
14
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/16/2013 ORDERING that this case be related to case 2:13-cv-00568 TLN KJN; ORDERING that the related case be assigned to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; VACATING all dates currently set in the reassigned case; ORDERING that the Clerk of Court make the appropriate adjustments in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
