Mullins et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Worlanda F. Mullins and Bruce A. Mullins |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2013cv00453 |
| March 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/19/2013 ORDERING 25 , 26 Plaintiffs' amended opposition and amended proposed order are STRICKEN. Apart from any objections that plaintiffs may submit to the district judge in response to the findings and recommendations, the court will disregard any further briefs, amendments, and/or other filings by plaintiffs in this case until the findings and recommendations are resolve. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/17/13 ORDERING that Wells Fargo's request for judicial notice 19 is GRANTED. The November 7, 2013 status (pre-trial scheduling) conference in this matter is VACATED. RECOMMENDING that Motion to dismiss 18 be GRANTED. The action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. F&R referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/5/13 ORDERING that the August 15, 2013 hearing on defendants motion to dismiss is VACATED. Plaintiffs shall file and serve an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to defendants motion within 21 days of this order. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiffs opposition, if any, within 21 days of service with the opposition. Thereafter, the matter will be submitted upon the record and briefs on file.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/1/13 ORDERING that the 16 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED as moot; the 16 proposed first amended complaint is deemed filed as the operative first amended complaint; defendant Wells Fargo shall respond within 21 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/24/13 ORDERING that Wells Fargo's request for judicial notice 8 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Wells Fargo's MOTION to DISMISS 7 is GRANTED, but with leave to amend. Pl aintiffs shall file an amended complaint in accordance with this order within 28 days. Alternatively, plaintiffs may file a notice of voluntary dismissal of their claims without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) (A)(i) of the FRCP within 28 days. Failure to file either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 28 days of this order may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
