Campos, et al v. Federal Home Loan Services Corp., et al
Raquel Campos and Ignacio Campos |
Quality Home Loan Services and Federal Home Loan Services Corp. |
2:2013cv00494 |
March 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/16/14 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' motions to dismiss, 36 42 be granted; Plaintiffs' first amended complaint, 33 be dismissed without leave to amend; and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Morrison C England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/12/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiffs' 21 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/15/13: Plaintiffs' October 1, 2013 motion to amend their complaint 33 is granted. This action will proceed on plaintiffs' first amended complaint 33 . Defendants' motions to dismiss 23 , 30 , are denied as moot and the October 30, 2013 hearing thereon is vacated. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's amended complaint within the time prescribed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 32 ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/24/2013 VACATING the Motion Hearing as to 21 Motion for Default Judgment set for 9/25/2013; RECOMMENDING that 21 Motion for Default Judgment be denied; REFERRING this matter to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; ORDERING that objections be filed within 14 days. (Michel, G) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/15/13 ORDERING that the Status Conference scheduled for 7/24/13, is RESCHEDULED for 10/23/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. On or before 10/9/2013 , the parties shall file Status Reports (or a joint status report) setting forth the matters referenced in the Court's 3/25/13 order. The USM is directed to serve a copy of this order on each defendant, and within 14 days thereafter, shall file a statement with the court that the order has been served. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the USM, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-930-2030).(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/25/2013 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING The Clerk of Court to issue all process pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 4; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to send the plaintiffs 2 USM-285 forms; 1 Summons, a copy of the 1 Complaint and this Court's New Case Documents; ADVISING the plaintiffs that the U.S. Marshal will require 1 completed Summons, 1 completed USM-285 form per defendant, 1 copy of the Complaint per defendant, plus 1 copy of the Complaint for the U.S. Marshal, and a full set of New Case Documents per defendant; ORDERING the plaintiffs to supply the U.S. Marshal all information necessary to effectuate process within 14 days; ORDERING plaintiffs to file a Statement with the Court that such service has been made; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve process, without prepayment of cost within 90 days. (cc; USM) (Michel, G) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.