Simmons v. Superior Court of Sacramento, et al.
|Defendant:||Lawrence Brown and Superior Court of Sacramento|
|Filed:||March 26, 2013|
|Court:||California Eastern District Court|
|Presiding Judge:||Craig M. Kellison|
|Nature of Suit:||Civil Rights|
|Cause of Action:||42:1983|
|Jury Demanded By:||None|
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 3, 2013||6||ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ronald Simmons signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/3/2013. Plaintiff's 3 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED and plaintiff is required to pay the $350.00 filing fee. The Sheriff is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff. The Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial) (Yin, K)|
|July 29, 2013||7||ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/29/2013 ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Yin, K)|
|December 13, 2013||8||ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/13/13 ORDERING that this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim and for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.