Brownrigg, et al. v. IPCO, LLC, et al.
Plaintiff: CommUnique Wireless, LLC and Edwin V. Brownrigg
Defendant: IPCO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00621
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Placer
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/13/13 EXTENDING defendants' time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint through and including 10/11/13. After due consideration and for good cause shown, such extension is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that defendants IPCO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC shall file their response to plaintiffs' complaint on or before 10/11/13. (Meuleman, A)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/2013 ORDERING that Defendants IPCO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before 9/13/2013. (Zignago, K.)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/24/13: Defendants IPCO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before August 30, 2013. (Kaminski, H)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/26/2013 ORDERING Defendants IPCO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC to file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint by 7/30/2013. (Michel, G)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/13: Defendants IPCO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before June 28, 2013. (Kaminski, H)
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/5/2013 ORDERING 8 that defendants shall file their response to plaintiffs' complaint on or before 5/9/2013 (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brownrigg, et al. v. IPCO, LLC, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CommUnique Wireless, LLC
Represented By: Justin H. Sanders, NCAED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin V. Brownrigg
Represented By: Justin H. Sanders, NCAED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IPCO, LLC
Represented By: Geoffrey M. Ezgar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SIPCO, LLC
Represented By: Geoffrey M. Ezgar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?