Pruitt v. Sacramento County Jail, et al
Darnell E. Pruitt |
Roulsh and Sacramento County Jail |
2:2013cv00640 |
April 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Kings |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/2013 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 15 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Darnell E. Pruitt signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/8/2013. CDCR is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/08/13 ordering plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the required trust account statement. The clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.