Zarate v. Amtrust Bank, et al
| J. Pedro Zarate |
| Quality Loan Service Corporation, Williams & Williams Worldwide Real Estate Actions, Re/Max Gold Real Estate, Linda K. Weeks and Amtrust Bank |
| 2:2013cv00659 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/1/13: ORDERING that 9 MOTION for 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME is GRANTED. RECOMMENDING that 16 MOTION for JUDGMENT be GRANTED. This action be REMANDED to the San Joaquin County Superior Court. 14 Motion to Dismiss be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. F&R referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/8/2013 ORDERING the 5 MOTION for JUDGMENT Hearing CONTINUED to 9/5/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Plaintiff shall file written objections or a statement of non-opposition to the motion on or before 8/22/2013. FDIC may file a written reply on or before 8/29/2013. The Status Conference is CONTINUED to 11/7/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
