Mann v. Heinauer et al
Plaintiff: Pritpal Singh Mann
Defendant: Gerard Heinauer, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00703
Filed: April 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/27/2014 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the any and all remaining claims in this matter be DISMISSED with prejudice and that the Court's final order is hereby ISSUED on this date in order that Plaintiff may file a direct appeal with the U.S. Appeals Court for the Ninth Circuit. Each party is responsible for its own costs and attorney's fees. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/2/14 DENYING 16 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; GRANTING 20 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Meuleman, A)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/23/14: The status conference scheduled for hearing on June 9, 2014, is vacated. Status Conference set for 9/15/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. A Joint Status Report shall be filed fourteen (14) days before the status conference. (Kaminski, H)
April 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/15/14 ORDERING that pursuant to stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on the parties' respective motions for summary judgment is rescheduled to June 2, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.(Becknal, R)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/31/14: Defendant has not shown that sufficient basis exists to relate the actions. Therefore, they will not be related. (Kaminski, H)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/25/2014 ORDERING 26 that Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 3/4/2014.(Reader, L)
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/25/14: Hearing as to 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, 16 Motion for Summary Judgment RESET for 3/24/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER 21 for extension of time signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/7/2014. Pursuant to Stipulation and for reasons stated therein, plaintiff's Opposition to defendants' 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in support of plaintiffs 16 Motion for Summary Judgment are due by 2/11/2014. Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 2/25/2014. (Marciel, M)
January 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/9/14 re 18 GRANTING 17 Motion to Modify 12 Scheduling Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 12 Scheduling Order is MODIFIED as follows: defendants' opposition and cross-motion for summar y judgment due on or before 1/21/14; plaintiff's opposition due on or before 2/4/13; defendants' reply due on or before 2/18/14; hearing on the cross-motions shall be noticed for 3/10/14 at 9:00 a.m. In the event the referenced cross-motio ns do not dispose of the case in its entirety, a further status (pretrial scheduling) conference is scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 6/9/14. The status conference scheduled for hearing on 4/28/14 is VACATED. A joint status report shall be filed 14 days before the status conference, in which the parties shall address all pertinent subjects set forth in Local Rule 240(a). (Meuleman, A)
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/19/2013 GRANTING 13 Joint motion to modify status pretrial scheduling order; Re-Adjudication: defendants shall issue a new decision on plaintiff's adjustment of status application on or before 10/21/2013; Discovery due by 11/12/2013; plaintiff's summary judgment motion by 12/10/2013, opposition and cross-motion by 1/7/2014; plainitff's opposition to defendants' cross-motion and reply by 1/14/2014; defendants' reply by 1/21/2014; hearing on the cross motions shall be noticed for 2/24/2014 at 9:00 AM; Further Status Conference: 4/28/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10; the Status Conference set for 2/24/2014 is VACATED; Joint Status Report shall be filed 14 days before the status conference. (Reader, L)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 7/5/13: The 7/8/2013 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is hereby VACATED; Plaintiff's summary judgment motion is due by 9/30/2013; Defendants' oppositi on and cross-motion is due by 10/28/2013; Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' cross-motion and reply in support of his summary judgment motion is due by 11/4/2013; Defendants' reply in support of its cross-motion for summary judgm ent is due by 11/12/2013; The hearing on the cross-motions shall be noticed for 12/2/2013, at 9:00 a.m.; A Further Status Conference is set for 2/24/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; A joint status report shall be filed 14 days before the status conference. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mann v. Heinauer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerard Heinauer
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janet Napolitano
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pritpal Singh Mann
Represented By: Robert Bradford Jobe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?