Murphy v. California Department of Corrections, et al
Petitioner: John Paul Murphy
Respondent: California Department of Corrections, M. Cate and M. McDonald
Case Number: 2:2013cv00710
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/27/2015 ORDERING that petitioner's 1 motions for discovery, evidentiary hearing and appointment of counsel are DENIED; AND RECOMMENDING that the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 28 days. (Yin, K)
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/17/15 granting plaintiff's requests for status 27 , 28 to the extent they have been addressed above. (Plummer, M)
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/24/2014 GRANTING respondent's 23 request to seal a document; the 4/8/2011 confidential memorandum is hereby SEALED. (Yin, K)
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER adopting 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/22/14: 12 Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. 18 Motion is denied as moot. Respondent is directed to file an answer within thirty days of the date on which this order is filed. (Kaminski, H)
December 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/6/13 RECOMMENDING that Respondents motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12 ) be granted as to petitioners Eighth Amendment claim (Ground One), which is not cognizable in habeas, a nd denied in all other respects; Petitioners motion regarding conditions of his housing (ECF No. 18 ) be denied as moot; and Respondent be directed to file an answer within thirty days of adoption of these findings and recommendations, should that occur. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. California Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Paul Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: California Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?