Thiessen v. Knipp et al
Petitioner: Sandor Torres Thiessen
Respondent: William Knipp and Matthew Cate
Case Number: 2:2013cv00722
Filed: April 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/22/16 recommending that no certificate of appealability be issued. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER denying 32 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/6/14. (Plummer, M)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/30/2014 ORDERING that the 1/14/2014 order to show cause is DISCHARGED; petitioner's 14 motion to stay is DENIED as moot; respondent's 26 request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and respondent has until 3/24/2014 to file a response to the petition. (Yin, K)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/14/2014 ORDERING petitioner to show cause, within 21 days, why his failure to oppose respondents' 12/18/13 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. (Yin, K)
June 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/27/13 ORDERING that Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; The May 23, 2013 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11 ) are VACATED; Petitioners motion for stay (ECF No. 2 ) is DENIED without prejudice; and within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall renew his motion for stay. (Dillon, M)
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/23/13 ORDERING that the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition filed in the i nstant case on the Attorney General of the State of California. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 04/12/13 motion for stay 2 be denied; and petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state remedies. MOTION to STAY 2 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General) (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thiessen v. Knipp et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sandor Torres Thiessen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Knipp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?