Hardney v. Virga
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 22, 2014
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/22/2014 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations in full. Federal habeas relief is DENIED as to petitioner's due process claim, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, and his claim that the Cali fornia Board of Parole Hearings violated its own policy in deferring his next parole suitability hearing for ten years. Petitioner's claim that his rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause were violated is DISMISSED without prejudice to any relief that may be available to petitioner as a member of the class in Gilman v. Fisher. The court DECLINES to issued a Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED.(Donati, J)
|August 8, 2014
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/7/14 RECOMMENDING that Federal habeas relief be denied as to petitioners due process claim, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, and his claim that the Board violate d its own policy in deferring his next parole suitability hearing for ten years; and Petitioners claim that his rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause were violated by the Boards 2011 decision to defer his next parole consideration hearing for a pe riod of ten years be dismissed without prejudice to any relief that may be available to petitioner as a member of the class in Gilman v. Fisher, 05-0830 LKK GGH P. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|April 30, 2013
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/29/13 ORDERING that Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?