Sharonoff v. Warden
Petitioner: Kenneth A. Sharonoff
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 2:2013cv00794
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/22/21 DISREGARDING 110 Motion for Judgment. (Plummer, M)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/19/2018 DENYING 96 Request for Clarification of 3/9/2018 judgment, construed as a request to alter or amend judgment. (cc USCA) (Washington, S)
March 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/8/18: The findings and recommendations filed May 16, 2017 84 , are adopted in full, except as provided by footnote 1 of this Order. The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is denied. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. (Kaminski, H)
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 89 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/17/17 recommending that petitioner's motion to amend 86 be denied. Motion 86 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/15/17 ORDERING that petitioner's motions for an evidentiary hearing 82 , 83 are denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/30/16 ORDERING that petitioner's motion for disposition of all claims (ECF No. 74 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is granted to the extent that a separate order will issue addressing the merits of the claims raised in petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Petitioners Article 440 Motion (ECF No. 75 ) is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/22/15 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/17/15 52 are ADOPTED in full; and Petitioner's MOTION to AMEND 37 is DENIED; and Petitioner's Request for Release 41 is DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/11/2015 ORDERING 57 that, upon reconsideration, this court's 6/17/2015 Order and Findings and Recommendations 52 are AFFIRMED. (Reader, L)
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/17/15 ORDERING petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing 41 is denied; and petitioner's motion for discovery 42 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's motion to amend 37 be denied. Petitioner's request for release 41 at 3 be denied. Motions 37 and 41 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/8/2015 DENYING petitioner's 50 request; and the Clerk shall send petitioner a § 1983 civil rights complaint form and the accompanying directions. (Yin, K)
October 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/30/2014 ADOPTING IN FULL 36 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 19 , 22 Motions to Stay; STRIKING 21 , 24 Amended Petitions for Writ of Habeas Corpus; DIRECTING the petitioner to file with in 28 days, a notice electing to delete the unexhausted claims and to proceed on the merits of his remaining exhausted claims in the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ALTERNATIVELY DIRECTING the petitioner to file within 28 days, a notice of vo luntary dismissal of this case without prejudice; INFORMING the petitioner that a failure to elect either option within the time provided will result in the striking and disregarding of the unexhausted claims identified herein and the submission of the case on the basis of the petition as amended by operation of this order; DECLINING to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. (Michel, G)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/2/14 RECOMMENDING that petitioners motions for a stay (ECF Nos. 19 , 22 ) be denied; Petitioners amended federal habeas petitions (ECF No. 21 , 24 ) be stricken from th e docket; Petitioner be directed to file, within 28 days of the filing date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations, either: 1) a notice that he elects to delete the unexhausted claims and proceed on the merits of his remaining exhausted claims in the original § 2254 petition; or, 2) a notice of voluntary dismissal of this case without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/30/14 denying 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/16/14 vacating 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and within 28 days from the filing date of this order, petitioner shall file a copy of his state habeas petition filed in the California Supreme Court on or about May 6, 2014.(Dillon, M)
June 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/02/14 recommending that petitioner's motions for a stay 19 , 22 be denied. Petitioner's amended federal habeas petitions 21 , 24 be stricken from the docket . Within 28 days of the filing date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations, petitioner be directed to file either: 1) a notice that he elects to delete the unexhausted claims and proceed on the merits of his remaining exhausted cla ims in the original 2254 petition; or 2) a notice of voluntary dismissal of this case without prejudice. In the event that petitioner fails to elect either option identified above within the time provided, the claims identified herein as unexhausted will be stricken and those portions of the petition disregarded for all purposes. The case will then be deemed submitted on the basis of the petition as amended by operation of this order. Motions 19 , 22 and petitions 21 , 24 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/14/14 ordering respondent shall show good cause in writing within 10 days after this order is filed for failing to file a completed consent or request for reassignment form. Prompt filing of a co mpleted form will be deemed full compliance with this order and will discharge the order to show cause. Petitioner's motion to quit claim 13 is denied. Petitioner is granted 30 days to file either a motion for voluntary dismissal or a motion for a stay and abeyance of the present action. Respondent is granted 14 days to file a response or a notice of non-opposition to any motion filed by petitioner. (Plummer, M)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER of TRANSFER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/23/13. Case Transferred to Sacramento Division; The New Case Number is: 2:13-cv-00794-AC. The Old Case Number is 1:13-cv-00560-BAM.(Gonzalez, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sharonoff v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth A. Sharonoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Kenneth Norman Sokoler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?