Labou v. Cellco Partnership et al
| Rebecka Labou |
| Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership and Cellco Partnership |
| 2:2013cv00844 |
| April 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/12/14 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, the putative claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, and the third party complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court further ORDERS that each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this action. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/30/2014 DENYING 40 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/28/2014 GRANTING 20 Motion to Deny Class Certification. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/18/13 GRANTING 28 Ex Parte Application. The Court ACCEPTS as filed Plaintiff's 25 Response in Opposition to Defendant's motion to deny class certification, which response in opposition is 25 pages in length. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
