United States v. Anchordoguy, et al.
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: Matthew R. Anchordoguy, Anchordoguy and Company Limited Partnership and John M. Barlow
Case Number: 2:2013cv00848
Filed: May 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Tehama
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/5/2020 TERMINATING 45 the Consent Decree. (Kastilahn, A)
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER CONTINUING STAY signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on September 3, 2014 re 35 . The stay of discovery and litigation previouslyreinstated is hereby continued. If a proposed consent decree is lodged on or before August 15, 2014, th e stay will be extended automatically through entry of the decree or until such time as the Court orders that the stay be lifted.If a proposed consent decree is not lodged on or before August 15, 2014, the stay will lift automatically as of August 18, 2014. (Rivas, A)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER REINSTATING STAY signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/22/2014 ORDERING 33 the stay of discovery and litigation previously entered is hereby REINSTATED; If a proposed consent decree is lodged on or before 8/8/2014, the stay will be extended automatically through entry of the decree or until such time as the Court orders that the stay be lifted; if a proposed consent decree is not lodged on or before 8/8/2014, the stay will lift automatically as of 8/11/2014. (Reader, L)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/13/2014 CONTINUING the Stay through the entry of any Consent Decree lodged before 7/15/2014 or until such time as the Court orders that the stay be lifted; if a Proposed Consent Decree is not lodged before 7/15/2014, ORDERING that the stay be lifted automatically as of 7/16/2014. (Michel, G)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/2/2014 CONTINUING the Stay through the entry of any Consent Decree lodged before 5/30/2014 or until such time as the Court orders that the stay be lifted; if a Proposed Consent Decree is not lodged before 5/30/2014, ORDERING that the stay be lifted automatically as of 6/1/2014. (Michel, G)
April 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/8/14 ORDERING In accordance with the parties joint stipulation and motion to immediately stay discovery and litigation, ECF No. 26 , filed on March 28, 2014, this action is immediately STAY ED through and including April 30, 2014. If a proposed consent decree is lodged on or before April 30, 2014, the stay will be extended automatically through entry of the decree or until such time as the Court orders that the stay be lifted. If a proposed consent decree is not lodged on or before April 30, 2014, the stay will lift automatically as of May 1, 2014.(Becknal, R)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/17/14 ORDERING that all Discovery shall be completed by 12/12/2014; Designation of Expert Witnesses is due by 2/13/2015; the last day to hear dispositive motions shall be 6/11/2015; the Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 8/20/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., with a joint final pretrial conference statement due by 7/30/2015; the parties shall file trial briefs not later than 8/6/2015; any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 7/30/2015, oppositions due by 8/6/2015, and any reply due by 8/13/2015; a Jury Trial is SET for 10/13/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. The parties estimate a trial length of twenty (20) days. A Settlement Conference is SET for 6/19/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge Carolyn K. Delaney confidential settlement conference statements not later than 6/12/2014. (Kastilahn, A)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/18/2013 ORDERING 18 that the Joint Status Report is due on or before 12/4/2013. (Reader, L)
October 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/8/2013 ORDERING the Joint Status Report due by 11/22/2013. (Donati, J)
August 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/2/2013 ORDERING the defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 9/27/2013; ORDERING that the parties file a joint status report 30 days from the filing of the answer or other responsive pleading. (Michel, G)
June 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER re: 11 Stipulation and Proposed Order signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/20/2013; New deadline for defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is 8/1/2013.(Waggoner, D)
June 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER 9 regarding Joint Status Report deadline and name change signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/5/2013. Defendant John Barlow's correct middle initial is "R" rather than "M" as alleged in Complaint. All references in Complaint to "John M. Barlow" shall be construed as "John R. Barlow" and Clerk shall correct docket accordingly. Secondly, the deadline for parties to file their Joint Status Report is 46 days from filing of Answer(s) to Complaint. Thus if defendant answer 1 Complaint on 7/1/2013, Joint Status Report will be due 8/16/2013. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States v. Anchordoguy, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew R. Anchordoguy
Represented By: Demar Bonn Hooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anchordoguy and Company Limited Partnership
Represented By: Demar Bonn Hooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John M. Barlow
Represented By: Demar Bonn Hooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Represented By: Andrew J. Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?