Townsend v. Atascadero State Hospital
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 7, 2014
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/7/2014 DENYING petitioner's 31 motion. (Yin, K)
|May 27, 2014
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/27/14 ORDERING Audrey King is substituted for the previous respondent, Atascadero State Hospital. The clerk shall assign a district judge to this case as both sides have not consented to the undersigned presiding pursuant to 28 USC section 636(c). Also, RECOMMENDING that the petition be dismissed in part and summarily denied in part. Judgment should be entered for respondent. The undersigned finds that no certificate of appealability should issue in this case. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|September 18, 2013
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/17/13 ORDERING that the 18 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; Respondents answer to the petition is deemed timely; and Petitioner shall file a traverse, if any, within 30 days of the date of service of this order.(Dillon, M)
|August 28, 2013
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/27/13 ordering within 14 days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve a responsive pleading in this matter and shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file the answer or motion to dismiss timely. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order on Michael Patrick Farrell, Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General)(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?