Verma, et al. v. Okev, et al.
Plaintiff: Kristi Verma, Vishal Verma and Zentek Corporation
Defendant: Efrat Okev, Lloyd Burton and Augzenta, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00865
Filed: May 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Placer
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/22/16 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/17/15 ORDERING that the date for the Parties to make their expert disclosures in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2) is EXTENDED to 5/13/15. All expert discovery shall be COMPLETED by 6/30/15. All other pretrial and trial deadlines shall remain unchanged. (Kastilahn, A)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 57 Motion to Appoint a Provisional Director signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/28/15. (Kaminski, H)
January 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 72 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/5/2015 ORDERING the parties to disclose experts by 2/13/2015; ORDERING that all expert discovery be completed by 3/27/2015; ORDERING that all other pretrial dates and deadlines remain unchanged. (Michel, G)
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/10/14 ORDERING the motions to compel, ECF Nos. 62 , 63 , are denied without prejudice and the February 4, 2015 hearing thereon is vacated. (Becknal, R)
October 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/29/2014 MODIFYING the 43 Pretrial Scheduling Order and the 51 Stipulation and Order re non-expery discovery; ORDERING that non-expert discovery, including any discovery motions, be completed by 12/12/2014; ORDERING that expert witnesses be disclosed by 12/29/2014. (Michel, G)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/28/14 ORDERING that the time for all parties to complete non-expert discovery is EXTENDED to 10/21/2014. (Kastilahn, A)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/17/14 ORDERING that all Discovery shall be completed by 8/22/2014; Designation of Expert Witnesses is due by 10/22/2014; the last day to hear dispositive motions shal l be 2/19/2015; the Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 4/30/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., with a joint final pretrial conference statement due by 4/9/2015; the parties shall file trial briefs no t later than 4/16/2015; any evidentiary or procedural motions are due by 4/9/2015, oppositions due by 4/16/2015, and any reply due by 4/23/2015; A Jury Trial is SET for 6/22/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. Engla nd, Jr.. The parties estimate a trial length of five (5) days. A Settlement Conference is SET for 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge Allison Claire confidential settlement conference statements not later than 6/2/2014. (Kastilahn, A)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/17/14 ORDERING that the time for Plaintiffs to file a responsive pleading shall be EXTENDED to 3/28/2014. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/31/13 ORDERING that Augzenta's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 15 is DENIED. Additionally, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 14 is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Tenth Causes of Action and GRANTED with leave to amend as to Plaintiffs' Second, Third, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh, Twelfth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Caus es of Action. Plaintiffs are not entitled to punitive damages as to their Fifth Cause of Action, but have otherwise adequately set forth their entitlement to recover such damages as to their other claims. Not later than thirty (30) days following the date this Memorandum and Order is electronically filed, Plaintiffs may (but are not required to) file an amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/26/2013 ORDERING 16 Motion Hearing on motions to dismiss, 14 , 15 Reset for 9/5/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.; Oppositions due by 8/22/2013, and replies on or before 8/29/2013. (Reader, L)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/25/2013 EXTENDING TIME to file a Joint Status Report; ORDERING that a Joint Status Report be filed by 8/2/2013. (Michel, G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verma, et al. v. Okev, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristi Verma
Represented By: Seth J. Schwartz
Represented By: Denise J. Serra
Represented By: Lee David Stimmel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vishal Verma
Represented By: Seth J. Schwartz
Represented By: Denise J. Serra
Represented By: Lee David Stimmel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zentek Corporation
Represented By: Seth J. Schwartz
Represented By: Denise J. Serra
Represented By: Lee David Stimmel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Efrat Okev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lloyd Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Augzenta, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?