H. et al v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company et al
A.H. and Timothy Hill |
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Critigen LLC Comprehensive Health and Welfare Benefits Program and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company |
2:2013cv00895 |
May 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Shasta |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
John A. Mendez |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/7/16. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiffs A.H., a minor by an through her Guardian Ad Litem, Timothy Hill and Timo thy Hill and Defendants Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, and Critigen LLC Comprehensive Health and Welfare Benefits Program. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER 11 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/17/13 ORDERING that Defendants may have an additional week's extension to and including July 24, 2013, to respond to the Complaint filed in this action. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/28/13 ORDERING the petition for an order appointing TIMOTHY HILL as guardian ad litem for the petitioner is GRANTED. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.