Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rangee

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rangee

Plaintiff:	Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:	Sandeep Kaur Rangee
Case Number:	2:2013cv00939
Filed:	May 13, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	San Joaquin
Presiding Judge:	Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge:	Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit:	Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action:	47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 24, 2013	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/23/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 10 Motion to Re-Open Case without prejudice. Should plaintiff submit a Second Motion to Re-Open, the Motion must comply with requirements of Rule 60(b) as outlined in this order as well as with Local Rule 230(j). Plaintiff may also move for a Protective Order. In sodoing, they must establish good cause as to why such an Order is warranted. If no Amended Motion to Re-Open this action is filed within 30 days of electronic filing of this Order, without further notice to parties, dismissal of plaintiff's Motion shall become final with no further leave to amend. (Marciel, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 24, 2013

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/23/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 10 Motion to Re-Open Case without prejudice. Should plaintiff submit a Second Motion to Re-Open, the Motion must comply with requirements of Rule 60(b) as outlined in this order as well as with Local Rule 230(j). Plaintiff may also move for a Protective Order. In sodoing, they must establish good cause as to why such an Order is warranted. If no Amended Motion to Re-Open this action is filed within 30 days of electronic filing of this Order, without further notice to parties, dismissal of plaintiff's Motion shall become final with no further leave to amend. (Marciel, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rangee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Represented By:	Thomas Peter Riley, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sandeep Kaur Rangee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?