Ramirez v. BNSF Railway Company, et al
Plaintiff: Graciela Ramirez
Defendant: Agustin Vidrio, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC and BNSF Railway Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv00968
Filed: May 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/15/14. A dispositional document shall be filed no later than 11/14/2014. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/15/14 ORDERING that the Scheduling Order is AMENDED as follows; Initial Expert Disclosure due 6/6/2014, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal Expert Disclosure due on or before 7/5/2014. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/27/2014 ORDERING that the Scheduling Order is AMENDED as follows: Initial expert disclosures due 5/22/2014 and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure are due by June 22, 2014; Each party will now be permitted twelve (12) total fact witness depositions. (Zignago, K.)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FOR PUBLICATION OF SUMMONS ON AGUSTIN VIDRIO signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/17/13.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/22/2013 ORDERING 15 Status Conference RESET for 11/25/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A further status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the Status Conference, in which the parties shall address how this matter should proceed without defendant Vidrio's participation. (Waggoner, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez v. BNSF Railway Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Agustin Vidrio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Jason W. Schaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Graciela Ramirez
Represented By: Mary E. Alexander
Represented By: Jennifer L Fiore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?