Coleman v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Robert E. Coleman
Defendant: California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Suzan Hubbard, T. Virga, D. Deroco, J. Clough, C. Haring, A. Konrad and S. Shannon
Case Number: 2:2013cv01021
Filed: May 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/17 ordering the Custodian to produce Robert Coleman on 3/02/17 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD) (Plummer, M)
October 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/16 denying 101 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/12/2016 ORDERING plaintiff's 91 motion to compel is GRANTED in part, in accordance with this order. In all other respects, plaintiff's motion to compel and 104 motion for in camera review are DENIED. Plaintiff's 91 motion for sanctions is DENIED. Plaintiff's 91 motion to extend the discovery deadline is PARTIALLY GRANTED. Discovery is reopened until 1/6/2017, for the limited purpose set forth in this ord er. No new discovery requests may be propounded by any party. The deadline for filing pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, is set for 3/8/2017. In all other respects, the 1/6/2016 scheduling order remains in effect. Plaintiff's 106 motion for sanctions is DENIED. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a copy of the court's docket. (Yin, K)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/2/2016 ORDERING within 14 days, defendants shall provide the court with the status of plaintiff's access to his legal materials and his ability to attend the law library; defendants' 98 motion to modify the dispositive motion deadline is PARTIALLY GRANTED; and the 7/15/2016 dispositive motion deadline is VACATED pending further order of the court.(Yin, K)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's May 12, 2016 motion (ECF No. 91 ) is construed as a motion to compel discovery and for sanctions, and includes a request to extend the discovery deadline; The parties shall brief plaintiffs motion (ECF No. 91 ) pursuant to Local Rule 230(l); and Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 91 ) is DENIED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2016 and agreed between the parties to EXTEND defendants' deadline for responding to plaintiff's 1/13/2016, interrogatories, requests for admissions, and request for documents to 4/29/2016, and the discovery to 5/15/2016. (Yin, K)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 84 motion for relief. (Yin, K)
December 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/18/15 DENYING 76 Motion. (Dillon, M)
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/15 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/22/15 67 are ADOPTED in full; and Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment 45 is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. Defendants Virga and DeRoco are directed to file an answer within twenty-one days of service of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/15 DENYING without prejudice 74 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/18/15 ordering plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second supplemental complaint 68 and his request for entry of default 71 are denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/21/15 recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment 45 be granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. Plaintiff's claims against defendant H aring should be dismissed without prejudice, based on plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. b. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Virga, DeRoco, and Clough that plaintiff was denied access to outdoor exercise in violati on of the Eighth Amendment should be dismissed without prejudice, based on plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies; c. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Clough should be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff' s failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and d. The motion for summary judgment by defendants Virga and DeRoco as to plaintiff's equal protection claims under the 14th amendment should be denied. Defendants Virga and DeRoco be directed to file an answer within 21 days. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 45 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
June 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/08/15 ordering that within 14 days from the date of this order, defendants shall respond to plaintiff's 05/29/15 motion 60 as set forth above. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed 7 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/15/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs April 10, 2015 motion (ECF No. 55 ) is construed as a motion pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and Within 21 days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a response, as set forth above; plaintiff may file a reply seven days thereafter.(Dillon, M)
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/14 denying without prejudice 48 Motion for sanctions. (Dillon, M)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/14 ORDERING that Defendants motion for an extension of time 47 is granted; Defendants shall file their reply on or before November 3, 2014; Defendants motion to strike portions of plaintiffs objections 50 is granted; and the following portions of plaintiffs objections 49 are stricken: page 5, line 18, through page 8, line 7, and Exhibit A attached thereto. (ECF No. 49 at 5:18 - 8:7 and Ex. A.)(Dillon, M)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/25/2014 DENYING plaintiff's 42 motion for sanctions. (Yin, K)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 19 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's 28 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/4/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's 19 memorandum, construed as a motion for reconsideration of the 9/24/13 order, is DENIED. (Yin, K)
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/24/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's 15 motion for TRO is DENIED without prejudice; the Clerk shall send petitioner the form for filing a § 1983 civil rights action; and plaintiff's 16 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K)
August 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Robert Coleman signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/28/13. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/10/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suzan Hubbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Deroco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Clough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Haring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Konrad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Shannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?