Hamilton v. Mule Creek State Prison, et al.
| David Hamilton |
| Mule Creek State Prison, Knipp, K. Sutterfield, L. Wilcox, V. Pickering, G. Young, Carrillo, J. Buckard and Heintschel |
| 2:2013cv01143 |
| June 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/31/19 RECOMMENDING that defendants Knipp, Vanni and Leese be dismissed for failure to state a claim; and defendants' motion for summary judgment 56 be granted. Motion 56 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/24/2018 DENYING 62 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 58 Order on Motion to Compel. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/09/18 DENYING 54 Motion to Compel. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/21/2017 DENYING 44 and 50 Motions for the Appointment of Counsel and DENYING 47 Request for Reconsideration. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/29/17: The findings and recommendations 43 , ARE ADOPTED IN FULL. Motion to Dismiss 20 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants J. Buckard, C. Heintschel, and I. Reyes are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
43
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/8/2017 RECOMMENDING defendants' 20 motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part; plaintiff's due process claim and First Amendment claim be dismi ssed with prejudice; defendants J. Buckard, C. Heintschel, and I. Reyes be dismissed with prejudice; and this action proceed on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against the remaining defendants. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/31/17 ordering that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this case and to update the docket to reflect the new case number. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr randomly assigned to this action. The new case number is 2:13-cv-1143 MCE CMK (PC). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/30/2014 ORDERING that plaintiff may file a first amended complaint within 30 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/24/13 granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Also, DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of David Hamilton. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forwa rd to the court until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California. New Case Number 2:13-cv-01143 CMK (PC). Old Case Number 1:13-cv-00838 GSA (PC), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/6/13. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
