United States of America v. EDF Resource Capital, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: EDF Resource Capital Inc and Redemption Reliance, LLC
Movant: Frank F. Dinsmore
Case Number: 2:2013cv01158
Filed: June 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/29/2018 APPROVING 119 Stipulation and DISMISSING Case With Prejudice, with all sides bearing their own attorneys' and experts' fees and all costs. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/15/2018 ORDERING the CONTINUING STAY of Pending Motions. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by 6/29/2018, if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Washington, S)
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/15/2018 ORDERING 113 that the stay of all actions on any pending motions is CONTINUED, including 68 the Motion to Intervene, and 90 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; a further status report shall be provided to the Court by 6/14/2018 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time; the parties should be prepared to move forward on this case if it is not resolved by 6/14/2018 and any further stay request will be disfavored by the Court. (Reader, L)
December 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/14/2017 CONTINUING STAY of Pending Motions. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by 3/14/2018, if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (York, M)
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 111 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/15/17 GRANTING a STAY of all actions on any pending motions, including the Motion to Intervene (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and A further STATUS REPORT shall be provided to the Court by December 14, 2017 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time.(Becknal, R)
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER CONTINUING STAY signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/15/2017 ORDERING That stay of all actions on any pending motions is CONTINUED 107 , including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore 68 and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the US 90 , which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and a further status report shall be provided to the Court by 9/15/2017 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Reader, L)
September 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/06/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to parties' 100 Stipulation, all hearings are VACATED and actions STAYED on any pending motions, including the 68 Motion to Intervene 90 and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and a further status report shall be provided to the Court by 03/15/17 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time. (Benson, A)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/3/14 ORDERING as follows: The motions to retain this case may be decided based upon the papers, and accordingly, the hearing scheduled for 2/10/14 is VACATED; Defendant's and proposed interveno r's motions to retain this case 62 & 70 are DENIED, and this matter is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case; the hearing on the motion to intervene 68 is hereby VACATED. That motion is also referred to the Magistrate Judge; The dates previously set by this court in its 10/31/13 order are hereby VACATED. (Becknal, R)
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/30/13 ORDERING that the Scheduling Conference will be held on 4/14/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/8/13 ORDERING that all hearing dates, filing dates and the scheduling conference in this matter are VACATED. When Plaintiff's employees and its counsel are permitted to resume their duties in this case, the parties are DIRECTED to meet-and-confer and submit a joint stipulation setting forth a proposed schedule. (Manzer, C)
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/23/13: Scheduling Conference RESET for 11/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. HEARING as to 68 Motion, 70 MOTION, 62 MOTION RESET for 11/4/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H)
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/13/13 ORDERING that the hearing on the Motions (EFC Nos. 62 , 68 , 70 ) and the Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 9/23/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. The deadlines for filing oppositions to these motions (8/26/2013) and replies, if any (9/3/2013),remain unchanged. The deadline for filing status reports is changed to 9/9/2013. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. EDF Resource Capital, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: David S. Klontz, GOVT
Represented By: Victor Weitao Zhao, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDF Resource Capital Inc
Represented By: David P. Callet, PHV
Represented By: Kurt A. Kappes
Represented By: Stephen Paffrath
Represented By: Jerry Stouck, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Redemption Reliance, LLC
Represented By: David P. Callet, PHV
Represented By: Kurt A. Kappes
Represented By: Stephen Paffrath
Represented By: Jerry Stouck, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Frank F. Dinsmore
Represented By: Daniel Philip Golden, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?