Carlson v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
| Etta Carlson |
| GARY WULZEN and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv01186 |
| June 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/27/13 ORDERING the Court having reviewed that stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: The Parties' stipulation is approved; Eastern District of California case numbe r 2:13-at-00622 styled ETTA CARLSON v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., et al. is hereby remanded to Sacramento County Superior Court; Each side will bear their own fees and costs and that there shall be no award of fees or costs as part of this remand; and The court clerk to issue a remittitur forthwith. REMANDING CASE to Sacramento Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/8/13; ORDERING that plaintiff is granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
